Why are you still using cmd.exe? I can't speak for anyone else, but when I'm doing computer support over slow lines into third-world countries, a GUI is a high-bandwidth luxury I cannot afford. Even using the Windows Computer Management console against a remote system is painfully slow compared to command line alternatives. Being able to do all of the following from the command-line is incredibly handy when doing remote support, for reasons of both speed and scriptability: • • • get the of a large log file on a remote system (yes, tail -f server path filename. Faceshop For Adobe Photoshop V3.5. log works) • • and many other uses I'm sure. 'fraid that UNC paths are not supported under cmd.exe. I wouldn't say this is accurate. You can't change directory to a UNC path, but you can do just about everything else.

You normally need to issue a net use with just the remote system name first to establish your credentials on the remote system (e. Resignation Day Banner Pilot Rar. g. Net use server), but after that you can use UNC paths from the command line just about anywhere you'd use regular drive letters and paths, with the exception of the cd command of course. Pushd and popd are pretty neat, I have to say, but I don't like mapping drives in batch files or Perl scripts, or sometimes I just want to run one or two commands using files on a remote system.

Mar 20, 2014 'CMD.EXE was started with the above path as the current directory. UNC paths are not supported. Defaulting to Window directory.' Definitely you should fix it. I am attempting to change directories to a file server such as: cd someServer someStuff However, I get the following error: CMD does not support UNC paths as. How do you handle “CMD does not support UNC paths as current. CMD does not support UNC paths as current directories. Link to a UNC Path in Windows XP.